The Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP) held a meeting with Bureau of Customs (BOC) Deputy Commissioner Nolasco Bathan on 02 December. The meeting, attended by representatives of PIP member companies, namely Chevron, Petron, Shell and PTT, discussed ways to strengthen the government’s fuel-marking program further and intensify efforts against fuel smuggling.

During the meeting, the PIP and the BOC exchanged views on current challenges in implementing and enforcing the fuel-marking program. At present, the fuel marking program remains a vital tool in ensuring tax payment and compliance, protecting government revenues, and promoting fair competition within the downstream petroleum industry. During this meeting, both the PIP and the BOC highlighted the importance of sustained coordination between government and industry to address operational gaps, industry concerns about the program, and smuggling activities more broadly.

Deputy Commissioner Bathan, for his part, acknowledged the concerns raised by PIP member companies and shared the Bureau’s commitment to enhancing inter-agency cooperation, improving monitoring mechanisms, and strengthening enforcement actions against illicit fuel trade. He encourages the PIP to provide industry feedback and recommendations to identify areas for improvement and refine implementation strategies, thereby strengthening the fuel marking program.

PIP reaffirmed its support for government initiatives to curb fuel smuggling and expressed its readiness to continue working closely with the BOC and other relevant agencies.

At the start of 2025, the Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP) has been actively engaging with key government agencies to address industry concerns and collaborate on regulatory developments, that can help improve the country’s energy sector. The series of consultative meetings between PIP and these vital government agencies reflects the institute’s commitment to promoting transparency, compliance, and collaboration. By aligning with the Department of Energy (DOE), the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), and the Bureau of Customs (BOC), PIP aims to shape policies that will not only improve the efficiency in doing business but also contribute to the nation’s energy and country’s economic growth.

The PIP calls for stronger support to curtail fuel smuggling. The PIP met with the BOC Deputy Commissioner Teddy Raval last 24 January 2025 to discuss the direction of the fuel marking program and to reinforce implementation at the retail stations. The Philippine government through the Department of Finance (DOF) launched the Fuel Marking Program in August 2019 to combat oil smuggling in the country thereby generating revenues to finance various infrastructure programs and social investments throughout the nation. The Bureau recently reported P242 billion in duties and taxes that were collected in 2024 under its fuel marking program (Business Mirror, 12 February 2025).

In the said meeting, the PIP and the BOC, together with the other players in the downstream oil industry agreed to strengthen coordination to help address fuel smuggling and improve the fuel marking program. The PIP has been advocating to the BOC to reinforce field testing at the retail sites and promote transparency through the conduct of third-party testing and validation.

The industry pushes for continued tax reforms and improvements. As the BIR plays a crucial role in the collection of taxes and the enforcement of fiscal policies in the Philippines, the PIP’s consultative meeting with the Bureau last 11 February 2025 aims to further streamline policies and compliance with tax regulations in the petroleum industry. The PIP requested to be enlightened on the Bureau’s major policies and programs for 2025 and to share feedback on some of the current tax-related concerns affecting the industry such as those related to tax refunds for jet fuel for international flights and reduction of the corporate withholding tax, and removal of the manufacturer’s and importer’s surety bond requirement, among others.

The PIP Tax Committee has been actively working with the Bureau through a constructive dialogue on industry concerns and reiterated the PIP members’ support to the Bureau’s initiatives to make the tax compliance process clear, simple, and convenient for taxpayers to comply.

The PIP has long been a vital partner of the DOE, particularly in formulating policies that affect the petroleum industry. This has started since the drafting and enactment of the Oil Deregulation Law (RA 8479) in 1998.

The PIP leads the development of petroleum products and facilities standards. Last 13 February and 18 February, the PIP and representatives of its member companies attended the meetings called by the DOE Oil Industry Management Bureau (OIMB) Technical Committee on Petroleum Products and Additives (TCPPA) and the Technical Committee on Petroleum Processes and Facilities (TCPPF), respectively.

The TCPPA meeting highlighted the technical committee’s accomplishments for 2024. The PIP member companies including other oil companies took this opportunity to raise a concern about the inadequate supply and high prices of coconut methyl ester (CME). The CME is derived from coconut oil and is blended to all diesel fuel sold across the country at 3% since October 1, 2024. The prices of CME has doubled after the implementation of a higher biodiesel blend.

The TCPPF meeting, on the other hand, finalized the product national standard (PNS) for LPG Import Facility that will be endorsed to the Bureau of Product Standards for approval. Two of the PIP members, namely Petron and Isla Gas, are active members of the Technical Working Group that facilitated the development of the said PNS.


13 February 2025 TCPPA meeting

18 February 2025 TCPPF meeting and signing of the PNS for LPG Import Terminal

11 February 2025 consultative meeting with the BIR Large Taxpayers Service Group

The Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP) has successfully completed its latest oil spill response exercise, marking the second of three drills conducted annually under the WISE (Waterborne Industry Spill Equipment) agreement amongst PIP members -Chevron Philippines, Petron Corporation, Shell Philippines Corporation, Total Philippines, PTT Philippines, and Isla Petroleum and Gas. The first drill took place on April 24 at Shell Philippines’ terminal in Tabangao, Batangas.

The second exercise, led by Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation (MTSC), was held on July 18 at the port of the South Reclamation Project (SRP) Cebu City. This is part of PIP WISE Philippines’ continuous advancement program, designed to test and improve the readiness and capabilities of response teams and their oil spill response equipment through the conduct of actual exhibition or simulation of oil spill response for Tier 1 to Tier 2 oil spill incidents.

The event was attended by representatives from PIP member companies, the Philippine Coast Guard Cebu (Talisay and Aduana Sub-Station) headed by Central Commander Cebu CG Capt Gerome Lozada, the Cebu City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, the PCG Marine Environmental Protection Command, the Cebu Port Authority, and the Department of Energy-Oil Industry Management Bureau (OIMB).

Coast Guard Captain Jerome Lozada expressed appreciation to PIP and MTSC for their efforts in enhancing oil spill response readiness. PIP WISE extends its gratitude to all participants and observers for their valuable contributions to the said drill.

Tugboat Pacific Rose 10 and Tugboat Pacific Rose 1 deployed the spill and started maneuvering as they make a “U” Formation and form a barrier around the spill, during the simulated exercise at Cebu City. Photo courtesy of Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation during the simulation exercise held in SRP Cebu City. Tugboat Pacific Rose 10 (left) as the lead OSR tug and Tugboat Pacific Rose 1 (right) as the back-up/assist, deployed the spill boom to make a “U” Formation as a barrier around the spill, holding the oil in place more efficiently. It was followed by “J” formation to prepare for the deployment of skimmer. Photo courtesy of Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation during the simulation exercise held in SRP Cebu City. The PIP’s oil spill response organization – Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation is preparing to launch the oil skimmer, after the product has been contained in the spill boom. Photo courtesy of Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation during the simulation exercise held in SRP Cebu City. The members of the Philippine Institute of Petroleum (Chevron, Petron, Shell, PTT, Total and Isla) together with the other attendees and participants of the PIP WISE Oil Spill Response Exercise from PCG, Cebu Port Authority, CDRRMC and the DOE-OIMB.
Present during the meeting are members of the PIP WISE Committee and MTSC officers, namely (from left to right): 1st row- MTSC President and Director Capt. Ebenezer G. Tañada, Jr., Capt. Leo Soriano (Shell), Engr. Marvin Dela Fuente (Isla LPG), MTSC Chief Finance Officer Randy Gampong; 2nd row – Ms. Nimfa Villamayor (PIP), Engr. John Willer Salle (Petron), Engr. Gian Carlo (Petron), Engr. Chito Barba (Petron), Engr. Jose Solomon (PTT), Engr. Ed Villena (Chevron), Ms. Dessa Diasanta (Chevron), Engr. Reymond Dimitui (PTT), Engr. Eladio Ablaza III (Total), and PIP Executive Director Raffy Capinpin.

PIP WISE PHILIPPINES AND MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT. The Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP) member companies recently renewed and strengthened its Waterborne Industry Oil Spill Equipment (WISE) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Malayan Towage and Salvage Corporation (MTSC) to another 5 years until 2028.

The WISE Memorandum of Agreement among PIP member companies was first initiated by PIP’s Health Safety Environment (HSE) & Marine Committee in 2009 essentially to contract a reputable Tier 2 Oil Spill Response Organization (OSRO) in the Philippines, founded on the basic principles of PIP of creating a venue for the sharing, preservation and refinement of best practices in the field of Quality, Security, Safety, Health & Environment.

The specific objectives of PIP’s WISE Memorandum of Agreement includes the following:

  • Establish a cooperative solution to address the environmental impact of an oil spill that may be brought by any unfavorable incident in the water borne supply operations of the members of PIP.
  • To contract a credible in-country oil spill response service provider to respond in the event of an oil spill (Tier II) incident in the Philippines on 24/7 “on-call” (Philippine-wide Coverage).
  • To maintain a stockpile of Oil Spill Equipment, Tugs & Spill Response Boats & other equipment, strategically located in various Ports of operation of the members of PIP. Oil Industry.
  • To undertake at least 3 oil spill response drills per year (desktop or actual) where PIP members and MTSC can test its readiness and develop best practices in responding to oil spills.

The PIP member companies include: Chevron Philippines, Inc., Isla LPG Corporation, Petron Corporation, PTT Philippines Corporation, Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, and Total Energies.

A number of House Bills (HB4550, HB4711, HB5172 and HB7928) have been filed in Congress that intends to repeal or amend certain provision of the Downstream Oil Deregulation Law (RA 8479).

With reference to the House Committee on Energy hearings on the subject matter, the Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP) has manifested the following points to the Congress:

  • Local oil price movements follow the trend of international oil price movements. Street level pricing or retail pricing on the other hand, is ultimately determined by competition in the particular location as all retailers (dealers) will always want to stay competitive with neighboring retail stations.  Healthy competition brings with it a natural check and balance.
  • The Oil Deregulation Law (RA 8479) has brought tremendous benefits to the oil industry.
    • The dominant market shares enjoyed by the so called big three oil companies pre-oil deregulation has now been broken up by the entry of numerous oil companies. As of 2019 data there are about 9,003 retails stations in the entire country. Of the total 9,003 retails stations, about 3,736 (41%) are oil majors and 5,267 (59%) are new players.
    • Deregulation brought about competition which saw the introduction of better-quality products, better retail station facilities and services, innovative promotions and also intense price discounting. Consumers enjoyed increased power of choice.
    • Deregulation lowered the industry’s barrier to entry and has given business opportunities to thousands of local entrepreneurs who have opened retail stations. This also saw the related growth of allied service providers like contractors, equipment suppliers and provided an efficient route to market for various non fuel products now sold in retail stations;
    • Regulation and/or Price Control will always diminish the attractiveness of an industry and can discourage potential new investments. This can be from the opening of new retail station by entrepreneurs, job creation for service providers and even to the entry of new oil companies.;
    • A deregulated industry brings about a more buoyant competitive market environment. It also stimulates investments and job creation.  Consumers benefit from increased power of choice, better quality products and a safer and pleasant refueling experience.

The government should continue focusing on promoting more competition, attracting more new players, encouraging more innovations as this will ultimately redound to an even heightened competitive environment that will impact pricing and quality of products and services.

PIP’s Position on the Oil Price Movements

Below are some of the comments and position of PIP pertaining to oil price movements and competition:

  • The weekly oil price movements announced by the downstream oil companies, whether an increase or decrease, will follow the trajectory of global/regional oil pricing as revealed in the Mean of Platts Singapore (MOPS). We deny the assertions that oil companies are quick to reflect oil price increases but is not too quick in reflecting price decreases;
  • There are many factors that influence international oil prices. Primary will be supply and demand and geo-political tensions.  The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic caused a global slump in demand thus oil prices went down significantly.  Now that some countries are opening up, and economies starts recovering, demand for fuel is increasing thus we see increases in fuel prices;
  • Given the deregulated nature of the industry, street level competition is the ultimate determinant of prices thus the retailers are given certain latitude to adjust their prices to match/beat competition in order to be competitive;
  • Many oil companies, including members of the Philippine Institute of Petroleum has challenged the legality of DOE’s DC2019-005-008 that mandates the unbundling of pricing components. This goes contrary to the Oil Deregulation Law and it jeopardizes the oil companies many trade and marketing secrets.  This will also cause the oil companies to violate their non-Disclosure agreements with their various suppliers of products and services;
  • The pricing disparity in Baguio versus that of Rosario, La Union is influenced by many factors such as competition, cost of doing business and logistical considerations but is caused primarily by comparing Baguio prices to a location where intense price competition is happening (Rosario, La Union);

Technology Solution Retail Outlets (TSRO), are commonly known as Fuel Vending Machines that addresses the fuel requirement of locations certified by LGU’s to be catered by the “bote-bote” (soda bottles) trade.

The “bote-bote” retailing of fuel is deemed dangerous to the health and safety of both the consumer and the retailer plus the source and quality of the fuel being sold cannot be ascertained to be compliant to the prescribed standards.

TSROs, like the fuel retailing outlets are also governed by the DOE’s Retail Rules (DC2017-11-0011), which specifically stipulates under Rule IV b. TSRO, the list of requirements for compliance:

  • Secure Certificate of Endorsement from LGU – Certifying that a TSRO intends to address the “bote-bote” retailing in the area being applied for;
  • Secure Certificate of Compliance (COC) from DOE;
  • Observance of 1 kilometer radius from another Retail Outlet;
  • No other commercial establishment shall installed/constructed with the Retail Outlet rather than those necessary for its operation;
  • The vehicle being serviced and the delivery of the liquid fuels by the tank truck shall at all times be inside the business premises;
  • One (1) meter set back distance shall be maintained in (a) the cashier’s boots or dispensing pump to firewalls and (b) tank trucks to firewalls (during supply operations).

Moreover, the DOE issued an Addendum to the Rule IV b. which allows a maximum of 2000 liters capacity for above ground storage tank (both for gasoline and diesel) that is petroleum compatible except plastic (HDPE) and appropriately protected with no visible mark of corrosion.  In addition, display of price and volume (in liters) should be present for dispensing pumps that should be equipped with safety breakaway couplings and a petroleum compatible hose not to exceed 5.5 meters.  Additionally, automatic shut off nozzles must also be present in the dispensing pumps.

TSROs are reportedly growing in several areas across the country.  According to reports, there are more than 200 TSROs operating in Oriental Mindoro and MIMAROPA (Marinduque, Romblon, Palawan).  Expansion areas reportedly includes Region 6 – Western Visayas consisting of 6 provinces namely Aklan, Antique, Negros Occidental, Capiz, Guimaras and Iloilo.

PIP Position

PIP supports the government initiatives to counter the “bote-bote” or soda bottle trading of fuel as this practice is unsafe and product quality is not assured.  Additionally, TSROs provide business opportunities and employment to small and medium sized entrepreneurs in the locations where they operate.

However, TSROs should also be supervised and monitored to ensure equal compliance to the DOE’s Retailing Rules and other government regulations to ensure safety and a level playing field.  In summary, PIP has expressed concerns on the following:

  • Health and Safety;
  • Proliferation of TSROs in non “bote-bote” areas; and
  • Level playing field.

On health and safety concerns, PIP has recommended that above-ground storage for 2000 Liters should be reconsidered as the Fire Code only allows a maximum of 454 liters with each container not exceeding 227 liters.  Above ground storage of fuel also requires a special concrete enclosure with mandated set back requirements from potential sources of ignition and nearby structures.  In addition to this, the use of reconditioned drums should also be prohibited as their integrity cannot be ascertained.

There are reported cases already that TSRO’s are seen being established in urban locations.  There are online advertisements of TSRO equipment being offered at a discount for Metro Manila and surrounding locations.  The DOE in a recent forum admitted that their official records as of September only shows a very limited number of Certificate of Compliance being given to TSRO’s and that the Fuel Vending Machines does not have any local certifying mark like the PS mark which can attest to its quality and safety.

PIP has always advocated for a level playing field amongst all players, whether these are TSRO’s, Marine Outlets and the regular fuel retail outlets.  TSRO’s should also be monitored for compliance to BIR registration and issuance of receipts, compliance with fuel marking certificates and bio fuel laws, compliance to the stringent requirements of the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Certificate of Compliance (CoC) and reportorial requirements and to the safety standards mandated by the Bureau of Fire Protection’s (BFP) Fire safety inspection and certificate.

A level playing field promotes investments, fair & healthy competition, consumer safety and tax generation for the government. Government efforts should be intensified to ensure that all abide by the rules and regulations in place, whether they are TSRO’s or regular retail fuel outlets.

The Mutual Aid for Response to Emergencies & Incidents Exercise/Drill aims to assess effectiveness of Mutual Aid Central Committee (MACC) procedure in terms of responding personnel’s safety and accounting of equipment lent. Built on mutual cooperation as the basic foundation of mutual aid and support, the Drills also test the inter-operability of PIP-member companies emergency response procedures vis-à-vis its alignment with the government, Local Government Units and other stakeholders’ emergency response resources available in a specific area of the drill site.

Critique sessions are conducted to draw lessons to identify improvements in emergency response mechanism of PIP member-companies and other stakeholders particularly in the event of any disasters and/or emergencies that is beyond the capabilities of the affected entity